John Tavener is best known for his glorious religious choral music. For Mother’s Day, this is his “Hymn to the Mother of God”. It is a transcendental experience to listen to it; like many things in the spiritual realm, it is simultaneously simple and complex.

The piece is scored for two choirs of approximately ten voices each. It’s harmonically driven (the melody isn’t particularly prominent or memorable), yet the harmony itself is simple – a choral hymn which doesn’t stray far from the home key. There are really only three phrases in the whole piece, and the third phrase is identical to the first. So what makes it sound other-worldly? First, each ten-voice choir is singing in a huge range in thick chords; second, each choir sings the same music three beats apart. The second choir ends up sounding like an echo of the first. This causes lots of notes to momentarily clash in dissonance, but then resolve to form a powerful consonance.

Short, simple, but wow does it pack a punch!

Remember that Seinfeld episode that turned a stupid catchphrase into a national sensation? ***

Thomas Morley (friend and composer of no less than Shakespeare) was in last week’s post: “April is in my Mistress’ Face“. His “Now is the Month of Maying” is another madrigal with seasonal references. This time, though, his December-hearted lover has been warmed by the May sun:

Everyone seems to want a piece of May 1st. Is it just about spring, or is it a religious festival, or day to celebrate the labor movement?

It’s a bit confusing, but then again, so is the Second Symphony of Dimitri Shostakovich. Written when the composer was barely 21 (which means, as a Russian, he was had been drinking vodka legally for only 9 years), it portrays the story of the October Revolution – not about May, but about the Soviet revolution, and therefore the labor movement. Shotakovich himself was a bit confusing, too, since he started his career as the Bolshevik poster boy, then he was shunned by the Soviets, then he was loved again, then he was hated again. Then he joined the communist party. Whatever, I’m confused; but so were audiences when the Second Symphony was first performed. The Russian laborers were baffled by the modernist, murmuring beginning that was void of any traditional melody or harmony – but were moved by the rousing revolutionary chorus that concludes the piece. Meanwhile, western European audiences loved the progressive beginning part, but were turned off by the cheesy revolutionary chorus.

Now I’m completely confused. I’m going to go back to circling a Maypole.