My Mind is Clearer Now … (not really)
This week I’m playing trombone in a pit orchestra for a community theater production of Andrew Lloyd Webber‘s Jesus Christ Superstar. I was introduced to this show as a teenager and immediately fell in love with it. When I was 16 I played it on piano for a professional theater, and often sang it with friends karaoke-style. However, this was 20 years ago.
The music has been on my mind this week, and not just because I’m actively participating in it. It’s kind of like visiting your old high school or hometown. It might look the same, or maybe it’s completely different. Maybe the visit fills you with nostalgia, or perhaps with hatred, love, confusion, or maybe even a oceanic connection to the past and future. But let’s not get carried away here.
The question I want to pose here is, why do we find this overture easy to swallow (musically speaking) whereas John Adams‘ Dr. Atomic symphony (a post from last week) is much more difficult?
I’m not sure I’m ready to give an answer, but here are some of the questions I’m ponderings and my thoughts:
- Is JCS “Art Music” or “Consumer Music?”
- Are my personal feelings (of nostalgia) clouding my judgment of this music (IE am I giving this piece more credit than is due because I loved it as a teenager) ?
- Am I giving Dr.A more credit than is due because my conservatory education says I should like it?
- Both pieces use highly accented pitch clusters in a rhythmic landscape, and are either atonal or have tonality ambiguity.
- JCS uses a lot more percussion – the familiar drum patterns make it easy to follow the shape of the piece, perhaps making the “ugly” pitch clusters more acceptable
- JCS also uses short, motivic melodic fragments that are later sung to words. Does the word-association with the motifs help us to accept them, even if they are discordant?
- Does the lack of a “rock” drumset in Dr.A make it “highbrow” and the inclusion of one in JCS make it “lowbrow”
Both pieces are actually very similar in my mind. I find much to like in each, though I can also identify their shortcomings. Dr. A is much more interesting, with a wider variation of material and broader palette of musical colors and styles. JCS is beautifully concise and balanced, and the melodic fragments are bite-sized, not overdone – which is a great virtue.
Your thoughts are welcome – listen to the JCS overture, and then the first 4 minutes (or more) of the Dr. Atomic Symphony:
JCS is show music – a category I’d put with Consumer Music. But it’s very GOOD show music.
I hope your personal feelings and your education are influencing your judgement.
You shine your usual bright light on the compositional similarities. I find JCS to be much more regular in rhythm, and also to have more sustained melodic lines. Together those make for songs (or, in a musical, numbers). But you’re right about melodies foreshadowing songs in short fragments. Aa for accepting them even though they’re discordant – I’ve always thought of the discord as text painting.
Highbrow? Lowbrow? Hmmm, the overture to Candide is usually identified as highbrow. If JCS were the work of a less “pop” composer I’d guess its overture would be right up there. Think of all the trouble getting rock drum sets on an orchestra stage …